Why European Visa Rules Are Much Stricter for Africans Than for Other Regions

Introduction

In recent discussions and reports, scholars and analysts have raised serious concerns about the fairness of European visa policies toward African nationals. These policies, particularly for Schengen visas, seem to disproportionately disadvantage African applicants, resulting in high rejection rates, steep financial losses, and constrained mobility. This article delves into the data, underlying causes, consequences, and possible reforms.

Data Overview and Patterns

2.1 Rejection Rates Soar for African Applicants

• In 2022, African applicants experienced a 30% rejection rate, compared to a global average of 17.5%

• African rejection rates are consistently 10 percentage points higher than the global average

• In specific countries, these rates ranged from 40% to nearly 46% in Algeria, Guinea‑Bissau, Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, Guinea, and Mali

• Exceptions: South Africa, Botswana, and Namibia have lower than 7% rejection rates, and Seychelles and Mauritius are visa-exempt for Schengen

2.2 Trends Over Time

• Between 2014 and 2022, African rejection rates rose from 18% to 30%, while the global average grew from 5% to 17.5%

• Meanwhile, Schengen visa applications globally dropped nearly 55%, from 16.7 million in 2014 to 7.6 million in 2022. African applications decreased only slightly, from 2.22 million to 2.05 million.

Financial & Emotional Costs to African Travelers

3.1 Non‑Refundable Fees and Lost Funds

• Every application costs €80–90 (later €90 fixed), regardless of outcome. In 2023, Africans paid around €56 million for failed Schengen visa applications; this rose toward €60–70 million in 2024 VisaVerge+2Africanews+2VisaVerge+2.

• Analysts liken these unrecovered fees for denied travelers to “reverse remittances”—money flowing from poorer to wealthier regions with no benefit schengenvisainfo.com.

3.2 Emotional Toll and Narrative of Exclusion

• African visa applicants frequently describe the process as humiliating, opaque, and demoralizing. Cultural and professional exchanges—especially among artists and academics—are often blocked at the border The Guardian.

• Commentators argue that discriminatory visa policies echo a form of global inequality or structural bias PubAffairs BruxellesThe Guardian.

Why Are Africans Being Denied So Often?

4.1 Economic and Passport Disparities

• Analysts highlight a strong correlation between a country’s GDP/GNI and its visa approval outcomes. African countries typically have weaker economies and lower-ranked passports on indices like Henley Passport Index.

• Weaker passports and limited visa-free access intensify scrutiny of African applicants, even when documentation is complete Henley & PartnersHenley & Partners.

4.2 Migration Policy and Security Concerns

• European visa rejections often rely on subjective judgments about whether applicants intend to return home. Factors include socio-economic conditions, family ties, and employment history. African applicants are often perceived—incorrectly—as more likely to overstay.

• Higher rejection rates are used as leverage in migration-readmission negotiations. Countries perceived as uncooperative in deporting irregular migrants face systematic visa penalties: fewer multiple-entry visas, longer processing, higher fees .

• Some African consulates handle high volumes of applications but lack the staffing or procedural capacity to issue visas efficiently. This often leads to prioritizing applicants with stronger connections to Europe—compounding rejection rates for others.

5.1 North West Africa in Focus

• Algeria submitted over 392,000 applications in 2022, with 46% rejected.

• Nigeria had a 45.1% rejection rate; Ghana 43.6%; Senegal 41.6%; Mali 39.9%; others follow similarly.

5.2 Broader Cultural & Academic Impacts

• African artists and academics have publicly condemned visa refusals as discriminatory. The EU collected approximately €130 million in 2023 from denied visa fees, creating barriers for cultural diplomacy and cross-border cooperation.

5.3 Migrant-Related Visa Sanctions

• In cases like Ethiopia and The Gambia, the EU responded to perceived lack of cooperation on deportations by increasing processing times (from 15 to 45 days), eliminating simplified paperwork, and stopping multiple-entry approvals. Applicants and diplomats must now pay fees, and tourism visae become harder.

Consequences for Africa–Europe Relations

Undermines Trade, Mobility & Trust

• Though Europe remains Africa’s largest trade partner, visa restrictions contradict EU narratives about people-to-people links and partnership. Restrictions can impair legitimate trade, investment, and academic collaboration Henley & Partners.

Reinforces Inequality in Global Mobility

• The visa discrepancy deepens the inequality of global movement: European passport holders can travel passport‑free across many regions, while Africans face multiple visas even to visit neighbouring countries Henley & PartnersThe Guardian.

Fuels Criticism of Double Standards

• Critics have called the policy “global apartheid.” They highlight that while EU citizens, even from less developed EU member countries, enjoy heavy mobility, African nationals face more barriers despite valid reasons for travel The GuardianPubAffairs Bruxelles.

What Needs to Change?

Reform Visa Policies

• Analysts call for removing the linkage between visa policy and deportation cooperation. Instead, visa issuance should rely purely on objective criteria, not punitive diplomacy PubAffairs BruxellesHenley & Partners.

Increase Transparency & Accountability

• Applicants often receive vague denials with little clarity. Embassies must ensure clear feedback, standardized evaluation criteria, and reduced discretionary bias.

Expand Legal Mobility Channels

• Europe could offer more structured pathways for student mobility, business travel, digital nomad passes, and temporary economic migration from Africa.

Encourage African Governments to Build Trust

• African states should support return‑and‑readmission frameworks while investing in infrastructure, economy, education, and legal frameworks. Ratifying the African Continental Free Movement Protocol may help show reciprocal commitmen.

Conclusion

Europe’s visa regime for African applicants presents a striking imbalance: significantly higher rejection rates, greater financial burdens, and emotional hardship. The use of visa processing as diplomatic leverage—combined with structural economic bias and passport inequality—deepens mobility gaps and strains trust. Recognizing these issues and reforming visa policy to emphasize fairness, transparency, and legal mobility is essential for genuine Africa–Europe partnerships.

📊 Quick Comparison Table

Would you like downloadable data visuals, policy recommendations, or country‑specific sections (e.g., Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia)? I can tailor additional content such as personal narratives or actionable advice for visa applicants.